Menu Icon

Vasectomy Reversal: What to Know

What is a vasectomy?

A vasectomy is a short surgical procedure that involves cutting and sealing the two vas deferentia (singular: vas deferens, also called ductus deferens), which are the tubes that carry sperm out of the epididymides (singular: epididymis; the structures on the back of the testicles where sperm mature) during ejaculation. The procedure needs to be performed on both sides to be successful.

Someone with a vasectomy will still ejaculate, but there will be no sperm in the ejaculate, and therefore no sperm to fertilize an egg and achieve conception. Vasectomies are a more effective form of contraception than other male contraceptive methods such as condoms and spermicides. They are also sometimes referred to as “sterilization” procedures because they are an option for permanent contraception; however, some vasectomies can be reversed.

Prevalence of vasectomies globally

A male may undergo a vasectomy to prevent unwanted pregnancies, but there is variation in the frequency of vasectomy between countries. For example, in individuals aged 15 to 49 using contraception, 20 percent of couples rely on vasectomy in the U.K., 19 percent in New Zealand, 15 percent in Canada, and 14 percent in Bhutan.i In the U.S., The National Survey of Family Growth estimates that 175,000 to 354,000 males undergo vasectomies each year.ii However, even though the prevalence is quite high in certain geographic regions, only 2.4 percent of males globally had a vasectomy as of 2011.iii

Male reproductive system diagram
A quick review of the male reproductive system

Can a vasectomy be reversed?

Following an initial vasectomy, an individual may decide that he wants to have the procedure reversed. Based on evidence from review studies, it is estimated that up to 6 percent of males choose to have a vasectomy reversal.iv,v

Reasons for vasectomy reversal include changed family goals: he may have a new partner who wants children, or he may want more children than he anticipated at the time of the vasectomy. In addition to wanting to restore fertility potential, individuals may seek out a reversal to relieve pain experienced after the vasectomy (a rare condition known as post-vasectomy pain syndrome, or PVPS).vi

There are multiple methods for reversing a vasectomy. The two main vasectomy reversal procedures are a vasovasostomy (VV) and a vasoepididymostomy (VE). VE is considered a more complex surgical procedure.vii

Most people who have had a vasectomy are candidates for vasectomy reversal surgery. However, it does not guarantee future fertility as the reversal may not be successful. There is evidence to suggest that the success of a vasectomy reversal may be related to the length of time between the vasectomy and the reversal procedure. This period is known as the “obstructive interval” (OI), which describes the amount of time during which the vas deferentia were intentionally obstructed. An older study by Dohl (2005) found that the rate of successful reversal (also called the patency rate) was 89 percent when the OI was less than five years. The success rate declined to 62 percent when the OI was greater than 15 years.viii

In summary, vasectomy reversals are more likely to restore fertility if less time has passed since the vasectomy was performed. If a longer time has passed between vasectomy and reversal, patients are more likely to require a more technically challenging vasoepididymostomy, as compared to vasovasostomy.ix

How does a vasectomy reversal work?

Vasectomy reversals are always performed by a urologist — often a urologist with special training in fertility procedures. If a patient is considering a vasectomy reversal, it is typically discussed with a family physician, who can make a referral to a urologist. Some patients can see a urologist directly without a referral from their primary doctor.

A vasectomy reversal consists of a vasovasostomy (VV) or a vasoepididymostomy (VE). Both procedures involve reconnecting the vas deferentia, which were previously separated to prevent the passage of semen through the male reproductive system. A reversal procedure is typically performed on both sides to increase success. A VV is the more straightforward procedure, while a VE is more technically challenging.x

In some cases, a VV may be performed on one side and a VE on the other. The decision to perform a VV versus a VE is made during surgery depending on the composition of the fluid present within the end of the cut vas deferens that connects to the epididymis. This fluid is extracted and examined under a microscope at the start of the procedure and, depending on the findings, will direct how the urologist proceeds.

  • Vasovasostomy (VV): If there are whole sperm seen within the fluid, it indicates that the epididymis has an unobstructed connection to the vas deferens and a VV can be performed on that side.xi During a VV, the cut ends of the vas deferens are reconnected to each other.
  • Vasoepididymostomy (VE): If there are no whole sperm seen within the fluid, only sperm heads or no sperm, there may be a blockage between the vas deferens and the epididymis, so the urologist may perform a VE on that side instead.xii During a VE, the cut end of the vas deferens is reconnected to the epididymis itself.

Some urologists may opt to cancel the procedure if they do not see any sperm or sperm parts of any kind in the fluid, due to the much lower success rate in this scenario.xiii

Since the 1970s, many urologists have used a microscope to perform both VV and VE as this technique has been shown to improve the success of reversal over using natural (unmagnified) vision.xiv More recently, some urologists have started using a specialized robot instead of an operating microscope, which is felt to have similar outcomes compared to the microscopic procedure.xv

Vasovasostomy (VV)

During a vasectomy, the vas deferens is cut and obstructed to prevent the passage of sperm through the male reproductive system. During a vasovasostomy, the two ends of the vas deferens that were separated and blocked are directly reattached to form an open, or patent, tube. This reconnection is referred to as “reanastomosis.” The two ends of the vas deferens are sewn together with tiny sutures.xvi

The procedure can be performed using a macroscopic approach (with the surgeon visualizing the vas deferentia directly), or by a microscopic or robotic approach (with the surgeon using a microscope or robot). A study by Duijn et al of 8,305 patients found that the macroscopic approach had a patency rate of 80.5 percent, and a pregnancy rate of 47.7 percent. The microscopic approach was more effective, with a patency rate of 91.4 percent and a pregnancy rate of 73.3 percent.xvii

Note: The term “patency” refers to the openness, or lack of blockage, in the vas deferens tube. The goal of a vasectomy reversal is to make the surgically obstructed tubes open again so that sperm can enter the ejaculate. As such, restoring patency is a measure of success in vasectomy reversal.

Because of the improved outcomes with the microscopic or robotic approach, many experts consider this technique to be the gold-standard method. However, because it requires more training, cost, time, and resources, some urologists perform the procedure either with natural vision or magnifying glasses despite the reduced success rate.xviii

Vasoepididymostomy (VE)

For some patients, a vasoepididymostomy will be required on one or both sides. The key difference between the VE and the VV has to do with where and how the vas deferens tube patency is restored. During a VV, the two separated ends of the vas deferens are reconnected. During a VE, one of the severed vas deferens ends is attached directly to an epididymal tubule within the epididymis (the structure on the back of the testicle where sperm matures). This technique requires the testes to be brought into the surgical field so the epididymis can be accessed.xix

VE is more technically difficult than VV, as both the vas deferens and epididymal tubule structures are very small and there is a size discrepancy between the two anatomical parts. The vas deferens already has a very small diameter of 0.3 to 0.5 mm, while the epididymal tubule has an even smaller diameter of 0.15 to 0.2 mm.xx

A VE is done instead of a VV if there is an obstruction of the epididymis or vas deferens at a location other than at the original vasectomy site, which can be determined by examining the fluid within the vas deferens as noted above. In addition to a longer obstructive interval (OI), indicators that a VE may be required rather than a VV include older patient age and if the procedure is a repeat attempt at vasectomy reversal.xxi If a VE is required on both sides (called bilateral VE), the success rate of vas deferens patency is lower at 40 to 60 percent.xxii

What happens after a vasectomy reversal? 

Since a vasectomy reversal is performed under general anesthesia, the patient is asleep during the procedure. Following the procedure, the patient is moved to a recovery room and can go home once they are able to tolerate eating and drinking, and have effective pain management with oral medications.xxiii,xxiv

Often, pain control is achieved without opioids — usually with ice, acetaminophen (Tylenol), and an anti-inflammatory such as ibuprofen (Advil or Motrin), or celecoxib (Celebrex).xxv However, some doctors will prescribe opiate pain medications after the procedure.

After discharge from the hospital, patients are typically recommended to refrain from ejaculation and strenuous exercise for four weeks, sometimes more or less depending on surgeon preference.xxvi

Following a vasectomy reversal, semen analyses are recommended every two to three months until sperm motility and concentration normalizes, or until pregnancy is achieved. Patency of the vas deferens indicates a successful vasectomy reversal and is defined as any motile sperm parts in a semen analysis.xxvii

While pregnancy is much more likely to result in the cases where semen analysis parameters are restored to normal or near-normal values, some studies have found that pregnancy is possible, though less likely, even if post-procedure sperm parameters are restored but remain abnormally low. For example, a study by Majzoub et al (2017) found that pregnancy was achieved post-vasectomy reversal in 21.3 percent of patients with (low) total sperm motility of less than 10 percent, in 15 percent with a (low) sperm concentration of less than 5 million/mL, and 14.8 percent with a (low) normal sperm morphology of less than 1 percent.xxviii

Examples of semen analysis for sperm count, sperm morphology, and sperm motility
Normal vs. abnormal sperm parameters

Do vasectomy reversals carry any risks?   

Vasectomy reversal surgery is usually safe but has rare complications including hematoma (bleeding leading to blood pooling within the scrotum), infection, and persistent pain (in patients undergoing the procedure to address post-vasectomy pain syndrome).xxix

The most common postoperative complication is the formation of a scrotal hematoma. This issue typically does not require treatment and usually resolves itself in six to 12 weeks. If the hematoma does not resolve, a tube can be placed within the scrotum to allow for the hematoma to drain, or it can be surgically removed through a small incision.xxx

Vasectomy reversal also carries the risk of re-obstruction of the vas deferens or epididymis following a previously successful vasectomy reversal. The risk of re-obstruction is between 3 to 12 percent after vasovasostomy (VV), and 21 percent after vasoepididymostomy (VE). Re-obstruction of the vas deferens results in infertility again, as sperm become unable to enter the ejaculate; therefore, conception cannot occur.xxxi

What are some alternatives to vasectomy reversal?

When someone with a vasectomy decides he wants to conceive a child, or restore his fertility, a vasectomy reversal is not the only option. Patients may instead opt to pursue in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) that uses some form of sperm retrieval.

There are different ways that sperm can be retrieved for ICSI, including testicular sperm extraction/aspiration (TESE/TESA) and percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA). Most of these procedures can be performed without general anesthesia using either local anesthesia (injection of a medication such as lidocaine to numb the patient) or light sedation.

A urologist may also offer to perform a sperm extraction at the same time as a patient’s vasectomy reversal. This way, if the reversal is not successful, the patient will have banked sperm that can be used in IVF, and they will not need to undergo a second procedure to extract sperm. If the vasectomy reversal is successful and pregnancy results, the extracted and banked sperm can be discarded.

The process of artificial insemination of an egg in an IVF clinic
The process of artificial insemination of an egg in an IVF clinic

Vasectomy reversal advantages and disadvantages

When comparing vasectomy reversal and IVF/ICSI with surgical sperm retrieval, vasectomy reversal has the following advantages and disadvantages:xxxii

Advantages

  • May improve post-vasectomy pain syndrome if present
  • Only requires a single intervention, if successful, to fully restore fertility
  • Allows for conception at home
  • May be less expensive than extraction combined with IVF/ICSI (though reversal surgery itself is more expensive than sperm retrieval alone)
  • Allows the patient’s partner to avoid possible risks of IVF/ICSI if there are no concurrent female fertility concerns

Disadvantages

  • Requires a urologist who is trained in microsurgical vasectomy reversal procedures
  • If not successful, the patient may need a sperm extraction procedure if it was not performed at the same time as the reversal procedure

IVF with surgical sperm retrieval advantages and disadvantages

IVF with a surgical sperm retrieval has the following advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages

  • Genetic disease screening is possible on embryos created with IVF
  • Can be used even if there have been multiple vasectomy reversal failures or if there are concurrent male fertility concerns such as known low sperm count (prior to the vasectomy) or hormonal issues
  • Useful if there is female factor infertility as well
  • Lower surgical and anesthesia risk (extraction can be performed with local anesthesia or sedation compared to general anesthesia for reversal)
  • Shorter time interval between procedure and attempt at conception (sperm can be used immediately for IVF as compared to several month wait to see if VV/VE restores fertility)  

Disadvantages

  • Sperm extracted must be used with IVF/ICSI and cannot be used for home or intrauterine insemination as extracted sperm are not fully motile
  • More expensive overall in countries where IVF/ICSI are not covered services (though the extraction procedure itself is less expensive)
  • May require multiple procedures if multiple pregnancies are desired and sufficient sperm are not extracted at the time of the first procedure (though in many cases a single extraction produces enough sperm for several cycles of IVF)
  • Higher risk of multiple gestation pregnancies and maternal risks due to use of IVF, which has increased morbidity/mortality
  • Requires a specialist in reproductive endocrinology and infertility

What treatment is best?

The American Urological Association released a Best Practice Statement that recommends IVF/ICSI over vasectomy reversal these scenarios:xxxiii

  1. The female has diminished ovarian reserve (due to age or any other condition)
  2. There are other coexisting female factors that decrease fertility
  3. A secondary condition, aside from the vasectomy, decreases the male's fertility
  4. There is a higher likelihood of success from IVF/ICSI rather than from vasectomy reversal alone

Overall, the gold standard treatment for male infertility due to vasectomy remains vasectomy reversal.xxxiv

Measuring success: Fertility after vasectomy reversal

The success of a vasectomy reversal procedure can be measured by semen analysis, in which ejaculated semen is collected and assessed under a microscope. As previously mentioned, patency is typically defined as the presence of any sperm in the postoperative ejaculate, which indicates a successful procedure.xxxv

The time it takes for sperm to return in the ejaculate depends on the type of vasectomy reversal procedure. After vasovasostomy, the mean time for sperm to return is 1.7 to 4.3 months. After vasoepididymostomy, the mean time is slightly longer at 2.8 to 6.6 months.xxxvi

Failure of a vasectomy reversal may occur early on or at a later stage. While early failure is often due to an unrecognized obstruction that was not corrected during the vasovasostomy, late failure can occur due to narrowing of the anastomosis (where the vas deferens was reconnected or connected to the epididymal tubule). Late failure typically occurs six to 14 months postoperatively.

Table 1. Vasectomy reversal procedure failure ratesxxxvii,xxxviii

Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval for conception

The pregnancy rate for vasectomy reversal compared to that of IVF/ICSI with sperm retrieval is similar.xxxix One meta-analysis of the pregnancy rate following vasovasostomy (which included older females) found that the pregnancy rate was 73.0 percent, and there was a higher pregnancy rate if the obstructive interval was less than 10 years. After a vasoepididymostomy, the pregnancy rate was found to be lower at 31.1 percent.xl,xli

In comparison, cumulative pregnancy rate after IVF/ICSI are 46.9 to 69.4 percent in females less than 35 years old, 35.5 to 62.0 percent in females aged 35 to 40, and 18.2 to 34.0 percent in females older than 40 years old.xlii

While both vasectomy reversal and IVF/ICSI are options for achieving fertility, a study from Uvin et al (2018) found that the time to pregnancy was quicker in the IVF/ICSI group compared to the group that underwent vasectomy reversal. In this study of 163 males undergoing vasectomy reversal or IVF/ICSI, the time to pregnancy was 8.2 months in the IVF/ICSI group compared to 16.3 months in the vasectomy reversal group.xliii

The same study found that the cumulative delivery rate was similar between the IVF/ICSI group and the vasectomy reversal group. The IVF/ICSI group had a 43.8 percent cumulative delivery rate, compared to 40.0 percent in the vasectomy reversal group, and the difference between the two groups was not found to be statistically significant. Therefore, both options have a similar efficacy at restoring fertility.xliv

Conclusion

While a vasectomy is still intended to be a permanent sterilization method, the majority of males who have had vasectomies in the past are able to reverse them, and potentially restore their fertility. The rate of success in restoring fertility depends on various factors, such as age and the length of time since the original vasectomy procedure. There are also less-invasive options to vasectomy reversal: namely, sperm retrieval procedures (i.e., TESE, PESE) for use in IVF with ICSI. To determine which procedure is best in individual circumstances, patients should speak to their family doctor or a urologist.

i Yang, F., et al. (2021). Review of vasectomy complications and safety concerns. The World Journal of Men's Health, 39(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.200073  

ii Shattuck, D., et al. (2016). A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(4), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235  

iii Shattuck, D., et al. (2016). A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(4), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235  

iv Andino, J. J., et al. (2021). Challenges in completing a successful vasectomy reversal. Andrologia, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14066  

v Elzanaty, S., & Dohle, G. R. (2012). Vasovasostomy and predictors of vasal patency: a systematic review. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 46(4), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2012.669790  

vi Fantus, R., & Halpern, J. (2021). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertility & Sterility, 115(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.054  

vii Fantus, R., & Halpern, J. (2021). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertility & Sterility, 115(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.054  

viii Dohle, G. R., & Smit, M. (2005). Microchirurgische vasovasostomie in het Erasmus MC, 1998-2002: resultaten en voorspellende factoren [Microsurgical vasovasostomy at the Erasmus MC, 1998-2002: results and predictive factors]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 149(49), 2743–2747. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16375020/  

ix Hayden, R. P., et al. (2019). Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: contemporary techniques, intraoperative decision making, and surgical training for the next generation. Fertility & Sterility, 111(3), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.004

x Namekawa, T., et al. (2018). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 17(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12207

xi Kirby, W., et al. (2017). Vasectomy reversal: decision making and technical innovations. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.22  

xii Kirby, W., et al. (2017). Vasectomy reversal: decision making and technical innovations. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.22

xiii Namekawa, T., et al. (2018). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 17(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12207  

xiv Silber S. J. (1977). Perfect anatomical reconstruction of vas deferens with a new microscopic surgical technique. Fertility and sterility, 28(1), 72–77.

xv Gözen, A. S., et al. (2020). Robot-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Current status and review of the literature. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46(5), 329-334. https://www.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20257

xvi Namekawa, T., et al. (2018). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 17(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12207  

xvii Duijn, M., et al. (2021). Outcomes of Macrosurgical Versus Microsurgical Vasovasostomy in Vasectomized Men: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. SN Compr. Clin. Med, 3, 2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-01011-1  

xviii Duijn, M., et al. (2021). Outcomes of Macrosurgical Versus Microsurgical Vasovasostomy in Vasectomized Men: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. SN Compr. Clin. Med, 3, 2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-01011-1  

xix Patel, A., et al. (2016). Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(3), 365-371. https://www.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.175091  

xx Patel, A., et al. (2016). Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(3), 365-371. https://www.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.175091  

xxi Namekawa, T., et al. (2018). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 17(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12207  

xxii Ory, J., et al. (2021). Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 16(3), E132–6. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7441  

xxiii Bernie, A. M., et al. (2012). Vasectomy reversal in humans. Spermatogenesis, 2(4), 273-278. https://www/doi.org/10.4161/spmg.22591  

xxiv Azhar, R. A., et al. (2016). Enhanced recovery after urological surgery: A contemporary systematic review of outcomes, key elements, and research needs. European Urology, 70(1), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051  

xxv Fantus, R., & Halpern, J. (2021). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertility & Sterility, 115(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.054  

xxvi Fantus, R., & Halpern, J. (2021). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertility & Sterility, 115(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.054  

xxvii Schlegel, P., & Ramasamy, R. (2011). Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update. Indian Journal of Urology, 27(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78440  

xxviii Majzoub, A., et al. (2017). Vasectomy reversal semen analysis: New reference ranges predict pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility, 107(4), 911-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.018  

xxix Fantus, R., & Halpern, J. (2021). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertility & Sterility, 115(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.054  

xxx Herrel, L., & Hsiao, W. (2012). Microsurgical vasovasostomy. Asian Journal of Andrology, 15(1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2012.79  

xxxi Schlegel, P., & Ramasamy, R. (2011). Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update. Indian Journal of Urology, 27(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78440  

xxxii Dubin, J. M., et al. (2021). Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization: A contemporary, comparative analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 115(6), 1377-1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.050  

xxxiii The management of obstructive azoospermia: A committee opinion. (2019). Fertility and Sterility, 111(5), 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.013  

xxxiv Shridharani, A., & Sandlow, J. I. (2010). Vasectomy reversal versus IVF with sperm retrieval: Which is better? Current Opinion in Urology, 20(6), 503-509. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e328

xxxv Farber, N. J., et al. (2019). The kinetics of sperm return and late failure following Vasovasostomy or Vasoepididymostomy: A systematic review. Journal of Urology, 201(2), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.092  

xxxvi Farber, N. J., et al. (2019). The kinetics of sperm return and late failure following Vasovasostomy or Vasoepididymostomy: A systematic review. Journal of Urology, 201(2), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.092  

xxxvii Fantus, R., & Halpern, J. (2021). Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertility & Sterility, 115(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.054  

xxxviii Ory, J., et al. (2021). Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 16(3), E132–6. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7441  

xxxix Dubin, J. M., et al. (2021). Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization: A contemporary, comparative analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 115(6), 1377-1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.050  

xl Herrel, L. A., et al. (2015). Outcomes of microsurgical Vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Urology, 85(4), 819-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.023  

xli Kim, D., et al. (2019). The role of vasoepididymostomy for treatment of obstructive azoospermia in the era of in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Journal of Andrology, 21(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_59_18  

xlii Witherspoon, L., & Flannigan, R. (2021). Fertility treatment options after vasectomy. BCMJ, 63(2), 62-66. https://bcmj.org/articles/fertility-treatment-options-after-vasectomy  

xliii Valerie, U., et al. (2018). Pregnancy after vasectomy: Surgical reversal or assisted reproduction? Human Reproduction, 33(7), 1218-1227. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey101

xliv Valerie, U., et al. (2018). Pregnancy after vasectomy: Surgical reversal or assisted reproduction? Human Reproduction, 33(7), 1218-1227. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey101

October 30, 2024